Slot Providers - 19 Makers, Real RTP Data

The provider matters as much as the casino. Providers set the RTP options. Casinos choose which variant to run. We tested slots from 19 makers at 2 real-money casinos and recorded exactly what the in-game paytable says - not what the marketing claims.

By Marcus Reid · Updated May 2026 · 19 providers tracked · 33 slots tested

18+ | Gamble responsibly | T&Cs apply

Provider Snapshot - May 2026

19
Providers tracked
-3.14pp
Worst avg gap
0pp
5 providers at max RTP
4
RTPs hidden by casino

Providers with the biggest average RTP gap - published max vs what casinos actually ran

1
Hacksaw Gaming
Worst Avg Gap #1
Hacksaw Gaming
5 slots tested · avg -3.14pp gap
Published avg 96.26%
Tested avg 93.12%
Avg gap across 5 slots -3.14pp 5 slots
See all Hacksaw slots →
2
onlyplay
Worst Avg Gap #2
onlyplay
1 slot tested · -3.00pp gap
Published max 97.00%
Tested at Pistolo 94.00%
Gap on Coin Flynn -3.00pp 1 slot
See all onlyplay slots →
NetGame
Best - 0pp Gap
NetGame
2 slots tested · 0pp gap on both
Published avg 96.25%
Tested avg 96.25%
Avg gap - exact max RTP 0.00pp 2 slots
See all NetGame slots →

All 19 Slot Providers - RTP Data

Search
Showing 19 of 19 providers

No providers match that search.

Slot Provider RTP Comparison - All Tested Results

Provider Slots tested Avg published RTP Avg tested RTP Avg gap Hidden RTPs
Hacksaw Gaming 596.26%93.12% -3.14pp0
onlyplay 197.00%94.00% -3.00pp0
Bgaming 197.25%94.25% -3.00pp0
Reel Kingdom 196.71%94.04% -2.67pp0
Evoplay Games 196.31%93.84% -2.47pp0
Pragmatic Play 696.37%94.44% -1.93pp0
Voltent 196.13%94.16% -1.97pp0
NowNow Gaming 196.26%94.41% -1.85pp0
Popiplay 194.94%93.94% -1.00pp0
Ela Games 295.05%95.30% +0.25pp0
Gamzix 196.06%96.06% 0.00pp0
Play n Go 294.27%94.27% 0.00pp0
NetGame 296.25%96.25% 0.00pp0
Endorphina 196.07%96.07% 0.00pp0
Yggdrasil Gaming 196.10%96.10% 0.00pp0
Amusnet 396.32% - 3 hidden3
Novomatic 195.48% - 1 hidden1
Wazdan 196.16% Not tested yet -0
Spinomenal 196.01% Not tested yet -0

Why the Slot Provider Matters for RTP

Most players focus on the casino. The provider is just as important. Providers don't just design the graphics and mechanics - they set the RTP configuration options that a casino can choose from. One game can have 3 or 4 different RTP settings baked in.

A casino picks whichever variant suits their margin. Gates of Olympus has a published max of 96.5%. We found it running at 94.5% at one casino. Same game, same spins, same mechanics - just a lower payout rate selected by the operator.

Providers who offer wide configuration ranges give casinos more flexibility. In practice, that usually means lower RTPs. Providers with fixed or narrow RTP ranges give players more certainty. That difference shows clearly in the table above.

How to Use This Provider Data

Click any provider card to see every slot we've tested from that maker. Each slot page shows the RTP reading by casino - so you can see exactly where a specific game runs highest.

Look at the comparison table above before you play. If a provider shows a consistent gap (like Hacksaw at -3.14pp avg), assume their games will run below max at most casinos. If a provider shows 0pp gap (NetGame, Play n Go, Endorphina), there's a better chance the casino is running close to max.

That said, 2 casinos is a small sample. A provider could run max RTP at one casino and well below it at another. Check the individual slot page for a per-casino breakdown before you decide where to play.